New Zealand–China Strategic Research Alliance 2023: call for proposals

We are inviting proposals for joint research partnerships between New Zealand and Chinese research organisations to facilitate bilateral science, research, and innovation collaborations.

About this opportunity

The New Zealand–China Strategic Research Alliance (SRA) is an annual joint funding programme funded by the Catalyst Strategic Fund. It is a bilateral initiative between MBIE and the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). 

This opportunity is open to New Zealand research organisations for projects that align with the objective of developing enduring science and innovation collaborative partnerships with world-class Chinese counterparts on topics important to both countries. Activities must significantly broaden and deepen collaborative research partnerships between China and New Zealand.

The funding available

MBIE has made up to $1.2m (excluding GST) in total over 3 years available for investment in joint research partnerships between New Zealand and China that cannot be supported through existing funding.

MBIE and MOST have agreed to support 4 projects through this funding round, 2 in each priority area of food science and environmental science. Up to $300,000 (excluding GST) over 3 years is available for the New Zealand research partners of each successful project.

Chinese partners must apply for their own funding through MOST.  

A separate call and subsequent assessment process will be administered by the Health Research Council (HRC) on behalf of MBIE in the third priority area: health and biomedical science. Contact the HRC directly about this process.

Contact us(external link) — HRC 

Investment priorities

The proposed projects must align with 1 of the 2 priority research areas:

  • Food science
  • Environmental science

Further sub-areas for these priority areas are listed below.

Food science

  • Animal and plant biotechnology
  • Alternative proteins
  • Biological hazards
  • Chemical hazards
  • Labelling and consumer information
  • Production, processing, and handling

Environmental science

  • Clean and renewable energy
  • Climate change
  • Biodiversity
  • Water research (including ocean research)
  • Natural hazards
  • Pollution on land and sea

Who can apply

For a proposal to be assessed it must meet the eligibility criteria set out below. Proposals that do not meet all of these criteria will be declined for funding on eligibility grounds.

  • The proposal must be made by a New Zealand-based research organisation or a New Zealand-based legal entity. representing a New Zealand-based research organization.
  • The Science Leader must be employed by a New Zealand-based research organisation, or a New Zealand-based legal entity representing a New Zealand-based research organization.
  • The proposal must involve collaboration from a leading Chinese research organisation (your Chinese counterparts must apply for their own funding through MOST).
  • The proposal must not be made by a department of the public service as listed in Schedule 2 of the Public Service Act 2020.
  • Proposals must not benefit a Russian state institution (including but not limited to support for Russian military or security activity) or an organisation outside government that may be perceived as contributing to the war effort.
  • Proposals must be uploaded by the closing date for proposals of 12 noon, 23 May 2023 in the Investment Management System (IMS) and meet the administrative requirements of MBIE.

Applicants may submit multiple proposals, but each proposal must be for a significantly different research project. If a New Zealand research team submits multiple proposals based on the same project, all proposals for that project may be deemed ineligible.

Proposals which also involve world class partners from other countries will be accepted, where these demonstrate the potential for increased excellence and impact beyond what is achievable through a New Zealand and Chinese partnership alone. Proposals which involve private sector partners are also eligible.

How to apply

Applicants are required to complete their proposals in our Investment Management System (IMS) – a secure online portal.

Proposals must be uploaded by the closing date for proposals: 12 noon, 23 May 2023. 

To help you prepare your proposal we’ve provided a proposal template.

1. Applicants submit a full proposal through the IMS. If you do not have an IMS login, you will need to request access (at least 2 weeks before you want to submit your proposal):

2. New Zealand research teams must consult their Chinese partners as some sections of your proposal require their information. Your Chinese counterparts must apply for their own funding through MOST.

3. Before developing your proposal, you are encouraged to consider the eligibility criteria, the assessment criteria, and the terms and conditions relating to this opportunity.

4. The proposal template provides guidance on how to prepare your proposal and the information you are required to provide. We recommend you use the proposal template provided to draft the required information in a word processer and then when ready to submit, copy and paste the necessary segments into the appropriate IMS fields and upload your supporting documentation where directed.

5. The information in your proposal is used for assessment and will form the basis of the contract for the project if your application is successful. 

How the funding can be used

What is fundable

Reasonable expenses directly related with the project and include:

Research activity expenses for:

  • consumables and other research expenses
  • personnel
  • contributions to pro-rated salaries.

Research exchange expenses for:

  • flights/transport 
  • accommodation 
  • travel visas and travel insurance 
  • meals.

All expenditure by individuals should adhere to the rules of the organisation they are affiliated with.

What is not fundable

Expenses not directly related with the project and include:

  • any capital expenditure (unless otherwise agreed with MBIE) 
  • dealing with accidents or disasters during the term of the contract 
  • alcohol
  • expenses unrelated to the delivery of the contract.

Key documents 

When developing your proposal, we encourage you to consult the following key reference documents:

Proposal Template for New Zealand–China SRA 2023 Funding Opportunity [DOCX, 215 KB]

National Statement of Science Investment 2015 to 2025 [PDF, 1.8 MB] — details the Government’s 10-year vision for New Zealand’s science system.

Vision Mātauranga policy [PDF, 359 KB] — outlines the Government’s policy framework that aims to unlock the innovation potential of Māori knowledge, resources, and people to assist New Zealanders to create a better future.

New Zealand–China SRA 2023 Funding Contract Template [DOCX, 153 KB]

Catalyst Fund webpages 

Key dates

Key activity Dates
26 April 2023 MBIE Portal (IMS) opens for proposals
23 May 2023 Closing date for proposals
31 May to 15 June 2023 Assignment of proposals to Assessors
4 August to 11 August 2023 Assessor Panel Meeting
January/February 2024 MBIE and MOST agree final funding decisions
February 2024 Investment funding decisions announced
March 2024 Contracts expected to begin

Dates are subject to change. If they change, we’ll let you know by email.

To be added to the email list, email:

You can also subscribe to our alert e-newsletter:

Sign up to receive Science and Innovation updates(external link)

Assessment information

Once you’ve submitted your proposal, this is the assessment process:

1. MBIE reviews applications to ensure they meet the eligibility criteria.

2. Independent Assessors review the proposals against the assessment criteria and, where relevant, the Vision Mātauranga Policy. Assessor scores and comments are entered into IMS.

Read more about the Vision Mātauranga Policy

3. Assessors attend an Assessment Panel meeting where the preliminary scores and comments are reviewed, scored, and ranked and consider portfolio balancing. The Panel reach a consensus about the preferred proposals, feedback comments, and recommendations which will inform the Panel Chair's report.

4. MOST conducts a parallel assessment process for Chinese applicants.

5. MBIE and MOST compare rankings to agree funding (where proposals have been ranked differently, MBIE and MOST will negotiate to agree which teams receive funding).

6. The Manager, International Science Partnerships will make funding decisions based on the Panel Chair’s report and the outcomes of discussions with MOST.

7. MBIE will notify applicants of the final funding decision and provide general feedback to all applicants on request.

Conflicts of interest 

If you are submitting a proposal, check the list of Assessors below (names will be published before 23 May 2023) for any potential conflicts of interest.

If you identify an actual, potential, or perceived direct or indirect conflict of interest, you must notify us before the application closing date with details for further discussion by emailing:

You must also notify us if you identify an actual, potential, or perceived direct or indirect conflict of interest, after the application closing date and before the final funding decision date.

Conflicts of interest may occur on 2 different levels:

1. A direct conflict of interest, where an Assessor is:

  • directly involved with a proposal (as a participant, manager, mentor, or partner) or has a close personal relationship with the applicant, for example, family members
  • a collaborator or in some other way involved with an applicant’s proposal.

2. An indirect conflict of interest, where an Assessor:

  • is employed by an organisation involved in a proposal but is not part of the applicant’s proposal
  • has a personal and/or professional relationship with one of the applicants, for example, an acquaintance
  • is assessing a proposal under discussion that may compete with their business interests.


A list of Assessors will be published here by 23 May 2023.

The assessment criteria

Assessors will assess proposals on each of the criteria (below) and them score them from 1 (Low quality) to 7 (High quality).

Excellence: 40% weighting

Will the activity lead to the creation of new knowledge through high quality research?

The Assessors will consider to what extent the proposal:

  • will lead to the creation of new knowledge which is of the highest calibre, and that will have national and international scientific impact and recognition
  • utilises applicable scientific and technological principles, including a well-designed research plan and a credible approach to managing risk, that will enable delivery of the proposed research aims
  • is ambitious in terms of scientific risk, novelty and/or innovative approaches, and leverages state-of the-art knowledge and facilities
  • is led by world-class science leaders or potential future leaders, with the skills, knowledge and resources to deliver the proposed activities and to manage risk
  • explains the science and innovation opportunities and contributions of Māori knowledge, people and resources for the benefit of all New Zealand.

Connections: 30% weighting

Will the proposed activity establish an enduring collaboration with world class international collaborators?

The Assessors will consider to what extent:

  • the New Zealand research team and its proposed international partners have excellent track records of collaborating with other institutions and delivering research results
  • the proposed partners offer highly complementary, world-class expertise, knowledge, capabilities and resources, building a high-performing and connected research team
  • the research team and its partner have outstanding capabilities and capacity to build and manage a substantive international partnership and fully realise the stated international opportunities
  • the research team and its partners have outstanding and comprehensive capabilities including scientific and other resourcing, and supporting infrastructure, to deliver the proposed activities
  • the proposed project will give effect to Vision Mātauranga policy, creating connections with and for Māori in a genuine and meaningful way.

Impact: 30% weighting

Will the project deliver benefit aligned to the wider economic, social and environmental goals of New Zealand?

The Assessors will consider to what extent:

  • the proposal has a strong line of sight to expected benefits that are of national and global significance, where the analysis supporting the estimates of benefits and uncertainty is excellent
  • the New Zealand and international partners have excellent records of engagement with end-users, with the potential to bring together New Zealand research capabilities
  • the proposal identifies opportunities and needs that are important/relevant to New Zealand and connected to multiple end-users or end-user research sectors
  • the project has potential to support a pipeline of research/knowledge transfer within the wider science systems to build long-term capability and enable the development of new ideas/applications 
  • the proposed research gives effect to Vision Mātauranga policy, including benefits to Māori (iwi, communities/groups, and/or businesses).

Other assessment criteria

When assessing proposals against the assessment criteria, MBIE will also take the following factors into account, including the extent to which the overall mix of investments:

  • are likely to achieve the objectives of this opportunity 
  • are likely to support the Vision Mātauranga policy

Vision Mātauranga

  • doesn’t overlap with similar projects already being funded 
  • will minimise the risk that applicants do not have the capacity to complete the research project because of existing commitments to other research projects.

Funding decisions

The Manager, International Science Partnerships at MBIE will make funding decisions based on Panel Chair’s report and the outcomes of discussions with MOST.

The decision and recommendations may also:

  • set pre-contract conditions which must be met before the investment is contracted
  • set special conditions in addition to the general terms and conditions set out in the Funding Contract
  • vary the proposed term of a proposal
  • vary the funding allocated from what is proposed and require critical performance indicators to be renegotiated to MBIE’s satisfaction to reflect the changed funding. 

We will advise the successful proposal's contact person of the funding decision by email. The funding decision will be announced by press release and published on MBIE's website. 

Contracting, reporting, and monitoring


Successful applicants will enter into a funding contract with MBIE subject to any special conditions being met.

New Zealand–China SRA 2023 Funding Contract Template [DOCX, 153 KB]


The contract holder must manage the approved funding to ensure delivery of the contracted project. Subject to specific contract conditions, funding will be provided in 6 instalments of equal value as follows: 

  • First payment: made on the next available payment date after the contract has been signed by both parties.
  • Subsequent payment: made every 6 months.

Reporting and monitoring

Successful applicants will be required to provide a report every 6 months. These reports are split into 3 types below.

Progress Report Meeting (after 6 months and in between annual reporting) 

A virtual meeting between MBIE and the research team to discuss overall status of project delivery and discussion of any emerging risks and what is being done to address them.

Annual report

This will include progress against the objectives and KPIs identified in the funding contract and details of any emerging risks and what is being done to address them. Annual reports are submitted in our online portal.

Final report

Required at the end of the project and will include commentary on the overall project outcomes, including key achievements, the steps taken and, where applicable, the changes made to your approach. The final report is submitted in our online portal.

Application queries



0800 693 778 (Monday to Friday, 8:30am to 4:30pm) 

Last updated: 26 April 2023