Aotearoa best practice dispute resolution framework (the Framework)
We developed the Framework with our stakeholders, who told us they wanted clear guidance on what good dispute resolution looks like in practice.
The Framework consists of 4 key elements:
- Best practice dispute resolution principles (the principles)
- Best practice dispute resolution standards (the standards)
- Capability maturity model with capability areas (what schemes should ‘do’ and ‘have’ to deliver best practice dispute resolution) and
- Maturity assessment tool (to help schemes assess how well they meet best practice).
GCDR is available to support you to use all the elements of the Framework and connect with other schemes.
Please contact us directly at firstname.lastname@example.org
If you are interested in updates from the GCDR team subscribe to our email newsletter below.
The 5 principles are the first element of the Framework. They are high-level statements of best practice, which are developed further in the other elements of the Framework.
The 9 standards identify core aspects of best practice that are both meaningful and measurable and that can be applied across the dispute resolution sector. They are not technical standards that set out agreed specifications for products, processes or services. They are aspirational standards intended to be a way of assessing best practice and the maturity of dispute resolution schemes.
Consistent with Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi
|Dispute resolution schemes demonstrate a commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi and the Treaty principles (including partnership, active protection and participation). Schemes design and deliver Māori culturally responsive dispute resolution for all Māori users. This includes recognition of Te Ao Māori and use of tikanga and te reo Māori in the design, resourcing and delivery of dispute resolution processes.|
Accessible to all potential users
|Dispute resolution services are accessible, visible and affordable for all people who may need to use them. Dispute resolution schemes proactively identify and respond to the diverse needs of people, whānau and communities.|
|Dispute resolution schemes are impartial. Appropriate actions are taken to maintain impartiality and mitigate the impacts where impartiality could be compromised or where there is a perceived lack of impartiality.|
|Dispute resolution schemes are independent. Appropriate actions are taken to maintain independence and mitigate the impacts where independence could be compromised or where there is a perceived lack of independence.|
Information about parties and disputes is used appropriately
|Where confidentiality applies, any exceptions are clearly communicated to all parties and participants in the dispute resolution process. Subject to relevant privacy and confidentiality rules, schemes can collect and gather information about dispute resolution processes and outcomes to support transparency, accountability and system improvement.|
|Dispute resolution processes are provided as quickly and efficiently as possible given the nature of the disputes and the processes used. Timely resolution does not compromise the quality of decision-making or dispute resolution processes.|
Promote early resolution and support prevention
|Dispute resolution schemes promote the resolution of disputes at the earliest opportunity or at the lowest level. Dispute resolution schemes support the prevention of future disputes through information, education and the distribution of actionable insights to appropriate organisations, agencies and/or regulators.|
Properly resourced to carry out the service
|Dispute resolution schemes have the appropriate funding, skills and capabilities needed to deliver dispute resolution services that are accessible, culturally responsive, timely and effective.|
Accountable through monitoring and data stewardship
|Dispute resolution schemes collect data and information that can be used to analyse the effectiveness of services and improve performance of both dispute resolution schemes and the regulatory systems in which they operate.|
Capability maturity model
The capability maturity model sets out detailed descriptions of 4 levels of maturity for each of the 35 capability areas within the standards. It should inform the policy development process in designing and implementing new schemes. The model can also be used for detailed reviews of existing schemes, or particular aspects of them. This deep analysis could be done for the independent reviews of schemes required by statute and/or in reporting to funding agencies, boards or Ministers.
Maturity assessment tool
The maturity assessment tool is designed to help schemes assess themselves against the capabilities for each of the 9 standards. This will allow schemes to identify what is working well, areas for improvement and what to strive for. It has been developed from the capability maturity model using summaries of the capabilities.
The tool provides a common language for schemes to connect with each other to share insights, good practice and common challenges. This will support schemes to collaborate on initiatives as part of a dispute resolution network.
How the tool can be used
The tool can be used by schemes in different ways, for example:
- self-review – to identify areas of strength or opportunity
- peer-based review – engaging a ‘critical friend’ to assess capability
- guided review – supported by GCDR
If you use the tool to self-review your scheme, we encourage you to provide feedback to us so we can continue to improve it.
We are happy to connect you with other schemes if you want to do a peer-based review, share insights and ways of working, or collaborate.
How to complete assessments using the tool
To assess your scheme, simply select 1 of the 9 standards and choose from the drop-down menus the description that best describes your scheme’s capability.
There are 4 maturity levels for each capability - developing, advancing, confident and leader.
The tool will generate a diagram showing a summary of your assessment.
How to use the Aotearoa dispute resolution best practice self assessment tool