-
Building and construction consultations
-
Work with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
- Minister's foreword
- Executive summary
- Introduction
- Current risk requirements
- Problem definition
- Options for working with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
- Closing remarks
- Summary of all consultation questions
- Glossary
- Annex I: Silicosis and engineered stone background
- Annex II: Overview of the health and safety regulatory regime
- Annex III: Revised Workplace Exposure Standard
- Annex IV: Further information on the status quo
- Annex V: Australia’s amendments to its regulatory settings in response to the risks posed by RCS
- Making it easier to build granny flats (2024)
- Building Code fire safety review discussion document
-
Summary of submissions: Building Code fire safety review
- Executive summary
- Submitters
- Outcomes of the fire safety review
- Effectiveness of fire safety measures in the Building Code
- Keeping pace with new technologies and new fire challenges
- Certainty, clarity, and consistency
- Suggested priorities
- Contributing issues from the background paper
- Other comments
- Appendix A: List of submitters
- Appendix B: Comments related to individual outcomes and issues
- Summary of submissions: Improving efficiency in the inspection process
- Review of the building consent system (snapshot)
- Proposed amendments to the BuiltReady Scheme Rules public consultation
-
Building consent system review: Options paper summary of submissions
- Introduction
- Key themes from submissions
- Promoting competition in the building regulatory system
- Removing impediments to product substitution and variation
- Strengthening roles and responsibilities
- New assurance pathways
- More efficient and streamlined delivery of building consent services
- Better performance monitoring and system stewardship
- Better responding to the needs and aspirations of Māori
- Addressing the interface between the building and resource consent system
- Submitter details
-
Improving efficiency in the inspection process: Discussion document
- Use of information
- Minister's foreword
- Introduction
- Increasing the uptake of remote inspections
- Section one: Options to increase the uptake of remote inspections and improve efficiency of inspection processes
- Section two: Increasing inspection capacity through the use of Accredited Organisations (Building)
- Appendix one: Full list of consultation questions
- Appendix two: Summary of options for feedback
-
Consultation document: Insulation requirements in housing and other buildings
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Insulation in housing and small buildings
- 3. Insulation in large buildings
- Appendix A: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and bu
- Appendix B: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and buildings up to 300m squared
- Appendix C: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
- Appendix D: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
-
Work with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
Submitters
We received 112 submissions on Building Code fire safety provisions - our largest response on fire safety in a decade. Feedback came from individuals, professionals, and organisations, including disabled and deaf communities.
On this page
Feedback on issues in the Building Code
From 23 October to 24 December, MBIE collected feedback on issues in the Building Code fire safety provisions. Submissions for the consultation could be provided via letters, email, and an online survey tool. A sign language version of the survey was also available.
MBIE received a total of 112 responses to this public consultation. This is the most submissions received on a fire safety topic in the last ten years. In total, the submissions included approximately 1900 individual comments totalling 200 pages of comments alongside 140 pages of attachments.
Submissions from individuals and organisations
Submitters were asked to describe their role. Responses are shown in Table 1.1 and Figure 1.1. There were 64 submissions on behalf of organisations and 48 submissions from individuals. The largest number of submitters were from architects, designers, and engineers. Submitters in other categories included:
- Researchers
- Representatives and members of deaf and disabled peoples’ communities
- Firefighters’ union and Fire and Emergency New Zealand
- Electricity distributors
- Building product manufacturers and suppliers
- Twelve submissions from those who did not state a role or preferred not to say.
In comparison to past consultations, typically, fire engineers and building consent authorities make up approximately 60% of all submissions on fire safety. For this consultation, these organisations make up only 30% of the submissions. Relatively more submissions were received from disabled people, building product suppliers, commercial and residential building owners, and building users than in previous consultations.
Industry bodies who submitted on the consultation included:
- Building Officials Institute New Zealand (BOINZ)
- Society of Fire Protection Engineers New Zealand Chapter (SFPE NZ)
- Engineering New Zealand Te Ao Rangahau
- New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union (NZPFU)
- Fire Protection Association New Zealand (FPANZ)
- Association of Building Compliance (ABC)
- Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ)
- Deaf Aotearoa
- Disabled Persons Assembly NZ (DPA)
- Deaf Action NZ
- New Zealand Disability Support Network (NZDSN).
A full list of the submitters is provided in Appendix A.
Appendix A: List of submitters
Table 1.1. Number of submissions received in the consultation
Role Architect, designer, or engineer Builder or tradesperson Building product manufacturer or supplier Building owner, resident, or occupant Independent qualified person (IQP) Others including those who did not state a role
Role | Number of submissions and percentage of total |
---|---|
Architect, designer, or engineer | 25 (22%) |
Builder or tradesperson | 4 (4%) |
Building consent officer or building consent authority | 16 (14%) |
Building product manufacturer or supplier | 14 (13%) |
Building owner, resident, or occupant | 12 (11%) |
Independent qualified person (IQP) | 6 (5%) |
Others including those who did not state a role | 35 (31%) |
Figure 1.1. Number of submissions received
