-
Building and construction consultations
-
Work with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
- Minister's foreword
- Executive summary
- Introduction
- Current risk requirements
- Problem definition
- Options for working with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
- Closing remarks
- Summary of all consultation questions
- Glossary
- Annex I: Silicosis and engineered stone background
- Annex II: Overview of the health and safety regulatory regime
- Annex III: Revised Workplace Exposure Standard
- Annex IV: Further information on the status quo
- Annex V: Australia’s amendments to its regulatory settings in response to the risks posed by RCS
- Making it easier to build granny flats (2024)
- Building Code fire safety review discussion document
-
Summary of submissions: Building Code fire safety review
- Executive summary
- Submitters
- Outcomes of the fire safety review
- Effectiveness of fire safety measures in the Building Code
- Keeping pace with new technologies and new fire challenges
- Certainty, clarity, and consistency
- Suggested priorities
- Contributing issues from the background paper
- Other comments
- Appendix A: List of submitters
- Appendix B: Comments related to individual outcomes and issues
- Summary of submissions: Improving efficiency in the inspection process
- Review of the building consent system (snapshot)
- Proposed amendments to the BuiltReady Scheme Rules public consultation
-
Building consent system review: Options paper summary of submissions
- Introduction
- Key themes from submissions
- Promoting competition in the building regulatory system
- Removing impediments to product substitution and variation
- Strengthening roles and responsibilities
- New assurance pathways
- More efficient and streamlined delivery of building consent services
- Better performance monitoring and system stewardship
- Better responding to the needs and aspirations of Māori
- Addressing the interface between the building and resource consent system
- Submitter details
-
Improving efficiency in the inspection process: Discussion document
- Use of information
- Minister's foreword
- Introduction
- Increasing the uptake of remote inspections
- Section one: Options to increase the uptake of remote inspections and improve efficiency of inspection processes
- Section two: Increasing inspection capacity through the use of Accredited Organisations (Building)
- Appendix one: Full list of consultation questions
- Appendix two: Summary of options for feedback
-
Consultation document: Insulation requirements in housing and other buildings
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Insulation in housing and small buildings
- 3. Insulation in large buildings
- Appendix A: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and bu
- Appendix B: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and buildings up to 300m squared
- Appendix C: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
- Appendix D: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
-
Work with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
Executive summary
A summary of the feedback received during the public consultation on issues in the fire safety provisions in the Building Code in 2024.
On this page
Consultation on issues in the fire safety provisions in the Building Code
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) conducted a public consultation from 23 October to 24 December 2024 on issues in the fire safety provisions of the Building Code. The consultation aimed to gather feedback on whether the current fire safety regulations are effective, clear, and responsive to modern building practices and technologies. It did not propose specific changes.
MBIE received 112 submissions which is the highest number for a fire safety consultation in the past decade. Submitters included architects, engineers, building consent authorities, product suppliers, building owners and occupants, disabled persons’ organisations, and Fire and Emergency New Zealand.
This document contains a summary of the feedback received during consultation.
Key findings
- Submitters supported the direction of the review – Over 80% of respondents agreed with the four proposed outcomes: improving clarity of protection levels, keeping pace with new technologies, ensuring cost-effectiveness, and reducing regulatory inconsistencies.
- Concerns about current performance – Fewer than 10% of respondents believed the Building Code was performing very well to achieve these outcomes. Most said it performed somewhat well or not well at all and suggested areas that needed improving.
- Evacuation for all building users – Nearly half of all submissions highlighted the need to improve evacuation provisions for people with disabilities, older adults, and children.
- Gaps in how the Building Code addresses specific fire hazards – Many submitters noted that the Building Code does not adequately reflect risks associated with building height, use, or complexity, and that it lacks flexibility to accommodate new technologies such as electric vehicles, solar panels, and battery storage systems.
- Barriers to innovation – Submitters pointed to difficulties using overseas products, mass timber, and alternative fire safety systems due to restrictive or outdated provisions.
- Clarity and consistency were frequently cited priorities – Submitters stated the need for clearer language, better alignment between Building Code clauses and supporting documents, and more consistent building classifications.
Submitters provided over 1,900 individual comments, identifying 183 contributing issues, including 10 new issues not previously documented.
Some submitters raised out-of-scope issues related to the building consent system, practitioner competency, and the Building Warrant of Fitness scheme.
MBIE will use the feedback to inform the next phase of the fire safety review, including the development of potential options for regulatory change.