Review of Consumer Credit law
Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA)
Making borrowing safer
When the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) reviewed the law about borrowing and lending, we heard that some Kiwis were facing problems. We asked for feedback on ways to fix them. We received 86 submissions and heard from consumers at a number of events. After considering these responses, the Government has decided to make the following law changes [PDF 214KB].
Interest and fees on high-cost loans will be limited to 100% of the amount borrowed (the loan principal). For example, if an individual borrows $500, they will never have to pay the lender back more than $1000, including all fees and interest.
Mobile traders will need to pass a 'fit and proper person' test, and register on the Financial Service Providers Register. ‘Do not knock’ stickers will be legally enforceable. This will lift professionalism in the sector and give consumers more power to refuse to engage with mobile traders.
Lenders will be required to prove (substantiate) that their fees are reasonable, if the Commerce Commission asks them to do so.
Key loan information will need to be shared with debtors at the start of debt collection activity.
You can find more detailed information about these changes in the:
- Cabinet paper [PDF 355KB]
- Regulatory Impact Statement [PDF 1MB]
- Read information about the consultation which led to these changes.
We will be publishing submissions shortly.
What happens next?
New legislation will now be drafted. There will be more chances to have your say on these proposals when the draft law is in parliament.
We will work with stakeholders, including lenders and debt collection agencies, to:
- finalise the details of the new requirements around affordability assessments, advertising and debt collection disclosure.
- create additional guidance in the Responsible Lending Code.
Research on lender's advertising and disclosure practices
The desk-based study of lenders [PDF 729KB] for 2017/2018 provides comparative analysis on the lender landscape and common advertising and disclosure practices from before the 2015 reforms came into force, and two years afterwards.
It provides data to support policy analysis around questions like:
- How clear and responsible is lender advertising?
- What are lenders’ fees and interest rates, as disclosed on their websites?
- What kinds of content and themes are present in lender advertising?
- What is the number (and turnover) of lenders since 2015?
- What proportion of lenders are complying with registration and disputes resolution registration requirements?