Tourism Infrastructure Fund eligibility and co-funding criteria
The Tourism Infrastructure Fund is open to councils, although some community organisations with council backing can apply.
Who can apply
The Tourism Infrastructure Fund is open to:
- all local councils
- not-for–profit community organisations that can demonstrate support from their local council.
Who a council authorises to make an application is up to them, but the person or organisation doing so must have the authority to commit the required local council co-funding.
Councils or community organisations with council support are eligible to apply for local visitor-related infrastructure.
Two or more councils can work together to submit a single application.
While regional councils are technically able to apply, projects considered eligible by the fund are mostly the responsibility of local council to co-fund and deliver.
However, we will consider applications for eligible projects that regional councils want to deliver and co-fund with the Tourism Infrastructure Fund.
Applications are invited from all councils.
For Round Five, applications from Kaikōura, Mackenzie, Queenstown Lakes, Fiordland and South Westland districts will be prioritised, and will receive a greater weighting during assessment.
Priority will also be given to:
- applicants who:
- have high visitor to ratepayer ratios
- are financially constrained, and
- have investigated alternative funding options.
- projects that:
- fund and deliver solutions to reduce pressure on existing infrastructure due to visitor growth
- support the Tourism Strategy
- represent value for money, and
- result in better outcomes for visitors.
The fund considers projects:
- able to start immediately
- to be completed over the longer term
- under $25,000 where a series of linked projects have been combined into one application. Applicants need to clearly state the priority for each sub-project in their application.
In summary, the criteria are:
- projects address capacity constraints, and/or support regions to realise their tourism potential
- projects demonstrate value for money, and have considered innovative approaches to delivery and funding
- co-funding is required, and other funding options have been investigated
- applicants are financially constrained.
Applicants are expected to co-fund their project to the maximum extent they are able, and to a minimum of 50%.
Applicants must demonstrate they have offered the maximum co-funding possible.
While proposals with co-funding below 50% will still be considered, our financial assessment would need to confirm that the council is financially constrained and unable to offer 50% co-funding.
For projects that are ready to start immediately, it's expected that the co-funding has been confirmed at the time of application.
The $25,000 minimum co-funding requirement doesn't apply to feasibility studies. However, applicants are expected to fund at least 50% of the total cost of the feasibility study.
The Tourism Infrastructure Fund supports the development of public infrastructure used by visitors. Examples of eligible projects include:
- freedom camping facilities
- sewerage and water (tourism-related portion only)
- safety upgrades to public spaces (eg, footpaths )
- infrastructure for natural attractions.
Signage, rest-stop facilities, and feasibility studies may be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Land owned by other government agencies
Projects that involve building tourism infrastructure on land owned by other government agencies (eg, the Department of Conservation, Land Information New Zealand or the New Zealand Transport Authority) are eligible for funding.
Land owned by commercial operators or iwi
Projects on land owned by commercial operators or iwi may be eligible. Councils would need to own the infrastructure that the fund supports — that is, register it as a council asset.
Councils are also responsible for making arrangements with the relevant agencies for the maintenance of the infrastructure and ongoing particular land access and use.
Long term and annual plans
Projects included in council long term and annual plans, or other consultation processes are eligible provided the council has not already decided to fully fund the project by itself.
The project would need:
- to be going ahead
- enable a superior solution to a problem than the solution the council can afford on its own, or
- make a vital project happen earlier.
Councils are required to demonstrate that there is community support for a project for which they're seeking funding. Projects that have been discussed with the community during consultation and/or planning processes would meet that requirement.
Health and safety
Projects based on health and safety improvements are eligible as long as they are public mixed-use infrastructure projects that:
- address an identified problem
- meet Fund eligibility criteria, and
- will have demonstrable benefits for visitors.
Camping ground infrastructure projects could be in scope, provided the campground is council-owned. We look closely at these proposals to consider their impact on commercial operators in the area (if any).
Wharves and berths
Infrastructure connected to wharves (eg, shelters or toilets for off-and on-boarding passengers) are eligible if they provide a solution to an identified problem. However, wharves and berths themselves are generally out of scope, but will be considered on a case by case basis.
Feasibility studies can be funded where applicants have established a tourism infrastructure problem that needs to be addressed but requires additional specialist advice on the best solution to that problem.
A separate application form for feasibility studies is available when funding rounds open.
Projects the fund doesn't support
The Tourism Infrastructure Fund doesn't support:
- projects under $25,000, although a series of linked projects can be combined to form one application. Applicants need to clearly state the priority for each sub-project in their application
- commercial, or semi-commercial facilities, infrastructure projects where central government has already dedicated investment. Examples include mobile blackspot coverage, New Zealand Transport Authority-funded land transport, or infrastructure that's not directly linked to visitor volumes (such as storm water systems)
- infrastructure projects without a substantial visitor-volume driven component
- government agencies and commercial entities
- projects receiving other central government funding. Lotteries grants are not considered to be central government funding
- cycle trails with Great Ride status. These already have a dedicated fund, so projects would need to clearly demonstrate they are not commercial in nature, and that other funding options have been investigated.