Breadcrumbs
Home ›
Business and employment
›
Employment and skills
›
Employment legislation reviews
›
Changes to ACC’s Accredited Employers Programme
...
›
Appendix 3 — How consultation proposals reflect co-design processes and MBIE review findings
-
Employment legislation reviews
- Employment Relations Act 2000 amendments
- Holidays Act reform
- Increasing the minimum sick leave entitlement
- Workplace relations in the screen industry
- Forced Labour Protocol
- Extending paid parental leave
- Equal Pay Amendment Act
- Law change for Easter Sunday shop trading
- Employment Standards Legislation Act
- Proposed Accident Compensation Appeal Tribunal
- Accident compensation dispute resolution review
- Reviewing regulated ACC payments for treatment
- Employment Relations Amendment Act
- Minimum wage reviews
- Sex work in New Zealand
- Changes to the process for setting pay for Members of Parliament
- Security officers – additional employment protections
- Matariki
- Updating Accident Compensation Review Costs Regulations
- Queen Elizabeth II Memorial Day
-
Changes to ACC’s Accredited Employers Programme
- Background
- Proposal 1: Implement new health and safety assessment requirements
- Proposal 2: Strengthen the assessment of Claims and Injury Management
- Proposal 3: Performance Monitoring
- Proposal 4: New pricing options for the Partnership Discount Plan
- Preliminary Proposal 1: Require Full and Final Settlement for Full Self Cover
- Appendix 1 — Implementation
- Appendix 2 — Current State of AEP
- Appendix 3 — How consultation proposals reflect co-design processes and MBIE review findings
- Review framework for list of occupational diseases
- Contractor work in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Support workers – request for additional employment protections
- Changes to ACC regulations for Chinese medicine, paramedics and audiometrists
- Accident Compensation (Interest on Instalments) Amendment Act
- Setting the average ACC levy rates for 2025/26, 2026/27, and 2027/28
Appendix 3 — How consultation proposals reflect co-design processes and MBIE review findings
This section is provided as a summary of how the consultation proposals reflect the prior four years of co-design, and how they address the findings of the 2018 MBIE review. The section is for your information only, so we are not seeking feedback on it.
On this page
The 2022 consultation proposals… | …address the findings of the 2018 MBIE review… | …and incorporates feedback from the TOM and co-design |
Implementing new health and safety assessment requirements | By ensuring that workers’ experience is an integral part of health and safety | By utilising health and safety assessment tools which are recognised by external regulators By putting worker wellbeing at the centre of AEP By ensuring quality assurance through a robust assessment process |
Strengthening the assessment of Claims and Injury Management | By ensuring that AEs and TPAs are effectively managing their workers’ claims | By introducing stronger claims and injury management requirements to ensure AEs and TPAs are effectively managing their workers’ claims By managing the AEP system rather than the contract |
Introducing a Performance Monitoring model | By providing clear measurements on an AE’s performance By setting clear performance requirements to become accredited and remain in AEP By embedding workers’ experience as making a meaningful impact on an AE’s performance By requiring AEs to provide the data necessary to enable performance monitoring | By setting incentives for AEP that drives performance By putting worker wellbeing at the centre of AEP By building a culture of continuous improvement By developing a holistic and outcomes-focussed performance monitoring system By ensuring quality assurance through a robust certification process By introducing qualitative and quantitative information requirements to understand the experience of workers in AEP By creating incentives for high performing AEs and consequences for poorly performing ones By allowing ACC to be more proactive in assessing an AE’s performance |
Provide additional Claims Management Periods for Accredited Employers in the Partnership Discount Plan | By setting incentives for AEP that drive performance By managing the AEP system rather than the contract By creating incentives for high performing AEs and consequences for poorly performing ones By ensuring claim files are handed back to ACC for ongoing management at the end of a Claims Management Period |